Forum

 
  Forum  Discussions  EMS  Transport Safety
Disabled Previous
 
Next Disabled
New Post 1/9/2010 7:05 AM
  bdean
1 posts
No Ranking


Transport Safety 

 How many EMS systems have policies on transport of patients concerning routine verses emergency?  We know that over the next few years there will hopefully be some changes in ambulance and patient transport safety with new innovative designs and transport regulations.  What current issues do you face?  How many have a policy on transports of CPR?  Do you currently work it on scene until you get a pulse or call it?  If transport is elected do you do it emergency or routine (for safety and effective compressions - studies show that compressions can not be performed by personnel appropriately in the back of a moving ambulance).  Thanks for reading....and replying!

 
New Post 2/4/2010 10:03 AM
  dhesselmeyer
1 posts
No Ranking


Re: Transport Safety 

Mr. Dean:

Great questions and topic.  In the system I work in we do not have a set in stone policy of routine versus emergency transports of patients but we do have some guidance in our protocols.  We must find a way to include this yet still allow for the interpretation of the patient's condition by the EMS crew.  As for working a cardiac arrest, it has been my experience that most staff would work on the scene.   Personally I like to try and work a little on the scene and then transport.  This allows for more efficient intubation and IV success (plus efficient CPR) but then also provides for quicker transport to other medical providers who can provide additional care.  I hope we continue to proceed to discuss more advanced topics like this and get away from the old Ambulance Driver mentality.

Thanks!

 
Disabled Previous
 
Next Disabled
  Forum  Discussions  EMS  Transport Safety